Where’s Johnny? - The Anonymous Gospels Pt. 1
Anonymity is the shield from the tyranny of the majority - John Paul Stevens
Wearied by a day's work, he tarries on his chair of theories. His fruitfulness wasn’t out of the ordinary: tis’ the season for chives and cherries, no time for shucking and jiving; he was a farmer married with a family and a maid, “Lee.” She looked over the farm, factory –you know– the domestic things. He was sitting in the corner when she knocked on the door. She…
Politely asked, “Excuse me?”
“What is it?” the man said.
“You have some mail, sir.”
“You can leave it on the bed.”
Lee left the mail there and went to look over the foundries. The man went to the bed when his face began to pound pale as palatine. All the mail was addressed to his teen. There was no name for the sender. His face went from pale to cinder, inflamed with horror and anger. He shouts out his home, “LEE, HOW MANY CATACOMBS DO I HAVE HERE!”
“What are you talking about?”
“I’M PRIMARILY SAYING NO MORE JUNK MAIL.”
By now, most people know how to spot a scam, fake, or phishing email. If not, you may have already been unwittingly taken advantage of by perpetrators in the digital age—leaving you even more vulnerable as AI emerges.
Today, we are launching a topical series that takes a necessary detour from our studies in 2 Peter. We call this series "The Anonymous Gospels." Our objective is twofold: first, to provide mature believers with a stronger foundation in Jesus, grounding them in an insight that inspires intellectual honesty and humility toward people of different faiths or no faith at all. Second, this series is for Agnostics, Atheists, and 'Exvangelicals'—those who walked away after encountering overwhelming evidence of defects or loopholes in the traditional presentation of Gospel "Truth."
We will begin this journey in the Gospel of John, starting at Chapter 13, verses 23–24. Let’s jump right in.
"One of them, the disciple whom Jesus loved, was reclining next to him. Simon Peter motioned to this disciple and said, 'Ask him which one he means.' Leaning back against Jesus, he asked him, 'Lord, who is it?'" — John 13:23-24
In the low light of the Last Supper, the striking drama unfolds. Jesus announces his betrayal, panic ripples through the room, and Simon Peter—the acknowledged rock of the apostles—has to gesture to an unnamed outsider just to get the Messiah’s ear. This mystery figure is simply called the disciple whom Jesus loved.
We are taught by modern tradition that this is John, the son of Zebedee. Yet, if we look closely at the text, the author never gives a name. In fact, this Gospel, like all four in our Bibles, is entirely written having an unknown or unacknowledged name.
white theology has prevailed in evangelicalism regardless of how incorrect, harmful, or ‘holey’ their theology is. – The Prototype, "Manifest Grace x Peace Pt. 1
Perhaps you are thinking, "James, all you've got to do is use context clues. In John 21, starting from verse 20, we know that the disciple Jesus loved is John." Let's look at the text:
Peter turned and saw that the disciple whom Jesus loved was following them. (This was the one who had leaned back against Jesus at the supper and had said, “Lord, who is going to betray you?”) — John 21:20 NIV
Here, we enter the world of textual interpretation. Lawyers, scholars, and daily conversations teach us that deception and misunderstandings frequently happen when facts are either assumed or omitted. We call this study hermeneutics (the methodology of interpretation). How foolish is it to assume a fact based entirely on confirmation bias? Nowhere in the Gospels does the text actually state the name of the one leaning on Jesus.
If we look at Matthew 26:20–25, not only is the "disciple whom Jesus loved" missing, but there is absolutely no mention of anyone leaning on Jesus at all:
When evening came, Jesus was reclining at the table with the Twelve. — Matthew 26:20
But at least we know Jesus was strictly with The Twelve.
Mark 14:12–26 gives a nearly identical account. Jesus arrives with The Twelve, and there is zero mention of a disciple leaning against his chest.
In Luke 22:14–23, we get an additional perspective. Here, Jesus is with "the apostles," but the sequence of events shifts. Not only is the beloved disciple completely absent from the room, but the timeline itself changes: Jesus institutes the Passover meal before he ever announces that someone will betray Him.
Let’s go back to John 21, for the ones who insist on confirmation bias, I’ll make it clear that it’s due to circular reasoning. Let’s look again at John 21:20:
20 Peter turned and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them, the one who also had leaned back against him during the supper and had said, “Lord, who is it that is going to betray you?” - John 21:20 ESV
How is it, we are at the end of this letter, referring to an event 8 chapters earlier, without giving a proper name?
23 One of his disciples, whom Jesus loved, was reclining at table at Jesus' side, 24 so Simon Peter motioned to him to ask Jesus of whom he was speaking. 25 So that disciple, leaning back against Jesus, said to him, “Lord, who is it?” - John 13:23-25
This is not news to the skeptic, agnostic, or atheist who is well-acquainted with the Scriptures. This pervasive anonymity raises profound, reasonable doubt. We simply do not know who the disciple Jesus loved actually was, and it certainly does not help that John 21 is widely debated as a later epilogue added to the text. Scholars generally agree that the original letter ended beautifully at John 20:30–31:
Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book. But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.
Furthermore, there are two other famous passages that scholars universally agree were added to this account centuries later. The first is John 7:53–8:11, the famous story of the woman caught in adultery. This narrative is entirely missing from the earliest and most reliable manuscripts, yet it is celebrated for Jesus's iconic words:
Then Jesus stood up again and said to the woman, “Where are your accusers? Didn’t even one of them condemn you?” “No, Lord,” she said. And Jesus said, “Neither do I. Go and sin no more.” — John 8:10-11 NLT
The second is John 5:4, which explains that an angel would periodically stir the waters of the pool to grant healing. This verse, too, is completely absent from the original Greek manuscripts.
This foundation for reasonable doubt goes all the way back to the very first sentence of the letter:
In the beginning was the Word… — John 1:1 KJV
The word translated here as “Word” is the Greek term logos, which denotes speech, rational discourse, or teaching. Centuries before Christ, it was first used by the Greek philosopher Heraclitus to describe the underlying, rational structure of the universe.
Later, this Greek concept was adopted and blended with Jewish theology by Philo of Alexandria (c. 20 BCE – 50 CE), a prominent Hellenistic Jewish philosopher. Philo was actively writing in Egypt during the exact era that Jesus is believed to have walked the earth in His incarnation.
Why does that matter?
Common sense should tell anyone: if we don’t know who wrote the message, how can we trust its truthfulness? In the Mosaic law, it is commanded, “Thou shalt not raise a false report.” (Exodus 23:1 KJV). The Hebrew word here for false is shav ($שָׁוְא$), a word that goes far deeper than a simple lie—it means something empty, void, or nothingness. Forcing a definitive author onto a completely blank slate feels, to an honest mind, like forgery at best and perjury at worst.
Believers, let’s be honest: adding later scribal details to these Gospel accounts while omitting the true identity of the author feels like a direct violation of the warnings in Deuteronomy 4:2 and Proverbs 30:6 not to add to God's words. Logically, we can prove that the Gospel of John was not decisively written by John. To argue against this historical reality is to argue against Logos itself—for Logos is the very root word for logic.
So, if we know there isn’t a factual foundation for attributing this letter to John, why do we keep doing it? Why lie to each other? All of the foundations in this letter are either anonymous, altered, or philosophically borrowed. For an intellectually honest person, rejecting this traditional presentation of the Gospel message feels less like an act of rebellion and more like an act of scriptural and moral integrity.
If the Second Epistle of Peter is debated by scholars today, imagine how many authentic letters from the apostles, whether written by hand or by a learned scribe would have been rejected because they use different language, talk about things that looks inconsistent with the rest of the Biblical canon, or seemingly have been written at a later date? Seems consistent with the way slaves would have been treated, past and present, right? – The Prototype, “Manifest Grace x Peace Pt. 1”
Truth by The 'Historical Method'
This historical reality should raise significant, burning questions:
- Were there "Gospel letters" written that were not anonymous?
- Were any of those non-anonymous letters actually written by members of The Twelve?
- Did Jesus himself ever write a Gospel account, documenting everything he did within his three years of ministry?
Because after all, the "disciple whom Jesus loved" could have just as easily been Simon the Zealot, or James the son of Zebedee.
Honestly, I believe the strongest argument for why these writings chose anonymity lies within Jesus’s own radical message about self-denial and taking up the cross. In John 12:25, we find a key teaching surrounding the dichotomy of self-love:
He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.
The Greek word translated as "lose" is apollymi, which means to destroy, render useless, kill, or lose utterly. For generations, these words have been taken to an extreme, literal radicalization—resulting either in historical martyrdom through perilous missionary work, or a psychological slow-suicide through toxic self-denial. I believe both of these traditional interpretations omit the whole truth.
As the Wisdom of Sirach beautifully balances:
He that is evil to himself, to whom will he be good? He shall not take pleasure in his goods. There is none worse than he that envieth himself; and this is a recompense of his wickedness. — Ecclesiasticus 14:5–6 KJVAAE
And later in the same chapter:
My son, according to thy ability do good to thyself, and give the Lord his due offering. — Ecclesiasticus 14:11 KJVAAE
It is because when you arrive at this widely debated epilogue—John 21—you encounter a highly specific phrase starting at verse 21:
Peter asked Jesus, “What about him, Lord?” — John 21:21 NLT
The Greek demonstrative pronoun used here is houtos ($οὗτος$). While it can be translated into various English pronouns depending on the context, let us follow the logical sequence we have built so far:
- The disciple whom Jesus loved is never named.
- The Gospel of John was written entirely anonymously.
- The writer records Jesus saying that if one loves one's own life, they must destroy (apollymi) it.
Therefore, the most honest, unbound translation would be:
Peter asked Jesus, “What about this one, Lord?” — John 21:21 TPV (The Prototype Version)
And in this passage, Jesus gives a deeply mysterious, often misunderstood answer:
Jesus replied, “If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you? As for you, follow me.” So the rumor spread among the community of believers that this disciple wouldn’t die. But that isn’t what Jesus said at all. He only said, “If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you?” — John 21:22–23
The mystery deepens when the Spirit of remembrance brings us back to the core declarations in John 3:
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. — John 3:16 KJV
And:
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. — John 3:36 KJV
This aligns perfectly with the ancient wisdom found in Jewish literature:
For God made not death: neither hath he pleasure in the destruction of the living. For he created all things, that they might have their being: and the generations of the world were healthful; and there is no poison of destruction in them, nor the kingdom of death upon the earth: (for righteousness is immortal) — Wisdom of Solomon 1:13–15 KJVAAE
From this matrix of texts, we arrive at a startling, logical conclusion: Jesus does want "this one" to remain until He returns to the earth. And that realization brings us to a revolutionary postulation. If it is textually correct to translate this phrase as "this one," could it be that this one is YOU?
Could it be that a profound miracle is waiting just behind the door of denying everything you think you are in 2026? A miracle that allows you to experience firsthand what it means to lean upon the shoulder of THE ONE who takes away the sins of the world, performs wonders, and did so many magnificent things they couldn't even be contained in ink?
Could it be that you are THE ONE promised to have life, and life more abundantly (John 10:10)? Could it be that you are THIS ONE who saw Jesus in the eternal past and will be raised up on the last day (John 6:40)? Could it be that through a timeless, mystical fellowship, you are actually ONE of THE TWELVE (John 13:23)?
Consider Paul's words to the Romans:
Through Christ, God has given us the <privilege and authority as apostles> to tell Gentiles everywhere what God has done for them, so that they will believe and obey him, bringing glory to his name. And you are included among those Gentiles who have been called to belong to Jesus Christ. — Romans 1:5–6 NLT <emphasis added>
If we are swept into this high apostolic calling, why then are so many people still dying? What is the contemporary Church doing today that keeps the Kingdom of Everlasting Life hindered by the cycles of decay and death? Are there still dogmatic lies being perpetuated within the institution that prevent us from experiencing the fullness of life Jesus promised?
It certainly sounds like it, if we are still wasting our breath preaching arbitrary human names attached to anonymous Gospel letters. It sounds like it, if we believe we are not called to the highest spiritual offices within the cosmos. It sounds like it, if we do not truly desire Jesus to return because we are too caught up in worldly ambitions, striving to make our own names known.
Why I don’t relate to 99% of Artists
Perhaps that is the underlying reason why so many of our beloved musicians and recording artists pass away right before our eyes. We chase the validation of being seen, rather than the confidence of exalting Christ’s perfect nature. When I say I don’t relate to 99% of artists today, this is one of the most solid reasons why. Something is fundamentally wrong with the way we manufacture music, the way Sunday services are conducted, and the way we share our music with the world.
Something is fundamentally wrong with the way we manufacture music, the way Sunday services are conducted, and the way we share our music with the world.
Perhaps that is also why so many missionaries and evangelists are dying on the field—not because they didn’t sincerely answer or delight in their calling, but because they did not realize the most effective way to spread the Gospel is to first possess the spiritual means to shield oneself and their community with the Living Word of God. (1 Tim 6:12)
Who knows? Objectively, we are still witnessing death all around us. But by laying down this foundation of uncompromised Truth, we are finally beginning to unearth the root of the problem. And indeed, I believe we are.
In the next part of this series, we will do the exact same thing, except we will be going over the supposed Gospel of Luke. We will keep stripping away these layers to lay a strong foundation of abiding and finding refuge in the life of Jesus Christ, so that whatever tribulations may come at His return, we may have the strength to endure it all through the power of God Almighty.
Now, Father:
These are small seeds of faith for those who are mature and those who are new to the faith. Open our eyes to see that there are more believers around us than those who are antagonistic to the faith. Open our eyes to see the hidden and wonderful things not disclosed in Scripture, revealing the true nature of the Son, the LORD of hosts.
In Christ's Name,
Amen.
I love you all. I’ll write again soon.
As Always,
The One
How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us? Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain. The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of the Lord; and what wisdom is in them? — Jeremiah 8:8–9 (KJV)
Comments ()